891 stories
·
5 followers

Tariffs

5 Comments and 17 Shares
[later] I don't get why our pizza slices have such terrible reviews; the geotextile-infused sauce gives the toppings incredible slope stability!
Read the whole story
officeglen
18 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
Share this story
Delete
5 public comments
ChristianDiscer
17 days ago
reply
Incorrect analogy – More like;
1) You want a pizza made from another region.
2) However, you must sell them some your ingredients before it can be made.
3) They charge a “tariff” to protect the income of their local farmer’s for other ingredients. You’re willing to pay the “tariff” because you like your ingredients better.
4) The pizza maker sells you the final pizza with a standard sales tax but no tariff
5) You paid the higher price and they made money from the tariff.

Trump is charging tariffs to increase the costs from other regions for several reasons. A) To negotiate down tariffs from other regions. B) Lower tariffs mean you pay a lower cost for your special pizza. C) To whittle down our regions deficit. D) and/or To increase local “ingredients” growth at lower cost for you.
sirwired
17 days ago
The analogy Randall posted was perfect. It’s based on that ridiculous chart the president displayed showing “tariff” rates all over the world allegedly imposed on the US. It was not, in fact, the average import duty charged, or any number even tangentially related to it, like indirect tariffs through subsidy. Instead, it was ( Trade Deficit / Import Value ) This produces a number that has nothing whatsoever to do with tariffs at all. Let’s say NowhereStan exports $1B of gold every year to the US, but gets all their material needs supplied by LocalRepublic, except for $1M a year of US bourbon, imported duty-free.In the real world, the tariff imposed by NowhereStan on the US is 0%. Using Trump Math, it’s 99.9%. This “We just don’t happen make to something the other party wants to buy, so we should punish them for it.” is what the strip is making fun of, not the general concept of tariffs.
bluebec
16 days ago
You (someone in the US) wants a pizza with ground beef on it. However, the US doesn't have enough cattle to meet demand for ground beef (true fact), so the US imports extra beef to meet demand. You (the person wanting the pizza with ground beef), pay an extra tax because the beef on your pizza was imported. The producer of the beef does not pay the tax. The importer of the beef pays the tax and passes it along the supply chain until you eventually pay for it. Now you're being taxed extra because the US Government (Trump) wants to claim it's being tough on the world while completely failing to understand how economies and tarrifs work. Tarrifs in the end make things more expensive for end users. How much extra is your car, computer, phone, clothing, shoes, medicine and food going to cost you?
ManBehindThePlan
17 days ago
reply
Explains with stick figures, XKCD goes to the heart of the matter of tariffs and STILL manages to make a joke!
rraszews
17 days ago
reply
The line break after "The President is mad" is absolutely perfect and frankly the sentence could have ended there just fine.
Columbia, MD
rickhensley
17 days ago
reply
Finally, a way to explain it that my wife can relate to.
Ohio
alt_text_bot
18 days ago
reply
[later] I don't get why our pizza slices have such terrible reviews; the geotextile-infused sauce gives the toppings incredible slope stability!

AI bots now beat 100% of those traffic-image CAPTCHAs

2 Shares
Examples of the kind of CAPTCHAs that image-recognition bots can now get past 100 percent of the time.

Enlarge / Examples of the kind of CAPTCHAs that image-recognition bots can now get past 100 percent of the time. (credit: Arxiv, Plesner et al.)

Anyone who has been surfing the web for a while is probably used to clicking through a CAPTCHA grid of street images, identifying everyday objects to prove that they're a human and not an automated bot. Now, though, new research claims that locally run bots using specially trained image-recognition models can match human-level performance in this style of CAPTCHA, achieving a 100 percent success rate despite being decidedly not human.

ETH Zurich PhD student Andreas Plesner and his colleagues' new research, available as a pre-print paper, focuses on Google's ReCAPTCHA v2, which challenges users to identify which street images in a grid contain items like bicycles, crosswalks, mountains, stairs, or traffic lights. Google began phasing that system out years ago in favor of an "invisible" reCAPTCHA v3 that analyzes user interactions rather than offering an explicit challenge.

Despite this, the older reCAPTCHA v2 is still used by millions of websites. And even sites that use the updated reCAPTCHA v3 will sometimes use reCAPTCHA v2 as a fallback when the updated system gives a user a low "human" confidence rating.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Read the whole story
officeglen
209 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
Share this story
Delete

https://whatsdifferentincanada.tumblr.com/post/753858494961188864

1 Share
Read the whole story
officeglen
308 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
sarkem
282 days ago
End to end or side by side?
Share this story
Delete

Just conservative things.

1 Share
Just conservative things. submitted by /u/gwh811 to r/conservativeterrorism
[link] [comments]
Read the whole story
officeglen
615 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
Share this story
Delete

A minute should have 100 seconds

1 Share
A minute should have 100 seconds submitted by /u/prosztatapj to r/BrandNewSentence
[link] [comments]
Read the whole story
officeglen
615 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
Share this story
Delete

Welp…

1 Share
Welp… submitted by /u/Madrizzle1 to r/oddlyterrifying
[link] [comments]
Read the whole story
officeglen
617 days ago
reply
ÜT: 50.285716,-119.256393
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories